4/12: Personality - Eysenck and Big Five; Social Psychology Part 1
Eysenck
- Introversion/Extroversion (1)
- Introvert (I) - quieter, reserved, routine, to themselves
- Extrovert (E)- louder, sociable, unpredictable, needs others
- Emotional Stability/Instability (2)
- 4 Types of People
- Sanguine
- Phlegmatic
- Melancholic
- Choleric
- Eysenck's Theory
- I = higher level of stimulation ARAS
- E= lower level of stimulation
- Gale's Optimal level = apt stimulation for task wanted
- Eysenck's Theory Revised
Big 5
- O.C.E.A.N.
- Openess
- curious novel ideas, unconventional
- Conscientiousness
- organization, plan-oriented, meticulous
- Extraversion
- Agreeableness
- cooperative, accommodating, no conflict
- Neuroticism
- Big 5 Criticisms
- Openess = Troublesome 5th factor
- content and replicability
- many different labels
- Not necessarily Comprehensive: other traits such as masculinity suggested
- Evaluating Personality Inventories
- Pros
- Easier, cheaper and faster to administer than Projective
- Objectively scored and standardized
- Appear = Greater Reliability and Validity
- not highly valid= can't analyze from MMPI alone
- Cons
- Tests fail to allow cultural differences in responses
- Measured traits cannot be directly examined
Social Psychology
- Definition: study of how we think about, influence, and relate to each other
- Power of:
- Importance of Cogntition
- Focuses on
- Interpersonal level of analysis
- 'Normal' populations; reaction of average individual to situation
- Empirical - experiments, data
- Social Influence and Conformity
- Social Influence: how other people and groups influences individual's behavior
- 3 types of changing one's behavior
- Conformity: consistent with Group Norms
- Compliance: Direct Request
- Obedience: Order from Authority Figure
- Conformity
- Two Reasons Why
- Informational influence
- Normative influence
- Informational social influence
- others = source of info
- desire to be right
- believe others can interpret ambiguous situation
- others can help us choose apt course of action
- Sherif, 1936
- Autokinetic effect - how fast light moved
- Asked how fast moving
- First alone
- Later in groups
- Results: people's answers converged
- When Conform
- Situation = Ambiguous
- Situation = Crisis
- limited time, others intensify panic
- Others = Experts
- looked to; not always reliable
- Normative social influence
- Social norms: implicit/explicit rules for acceptable behavior
- Greatest Influence
- Uncertain Conditions
- Similar Source
- Concerned about Relationship with Source
- Most Salient norm = Influence behavior
- How react to unambiguous stimuli?
- Asch study = one seen @ class with confederates saying wrong answer on line comparisons
- 76% conformed with wrong answer at least wrong
- Didn't want to look foolish; knew right answer though
- How do we know this isn't informational social conformity?
- Private responding = didn't conform
- Why do we Conform?
- Informational influence: others' behavior ---> info
- More Ambiguity-----> More Likely Conform
- Leads to Private Acceptance
- Normative influence: Social Approval
- Asch studies
- Leads to Public Compliance
- Normative Social Influence in our Lives
- Social Influence and Women's Body Image
- Social Influence: Women from Heavier----->Thinner
- Social Influence and Men's Body Image
- Social Influence: Men Stronger
- Consequences of Not Conforming
- Convincing Deviant to Conform, e.g. 1st = Talking; 2nd = Punishing; 3rd = Ignoring
- Remain Deviant = Social Rejection
- Idiosyncratic credits
- allowed to deviate a little if conformed a lot
- Power of Obedience
- Crimes of Obedienc
- The Nazis, A few Good men
- Milgram's Shock generator
- recruit via newspaper
- confederate = participant in disguise
- expresses concern about heart condition
- confederate gets answers wrong------>participant shocks confederate
- Shock Recipient (recorded response)
- interjects----> owww----> begs to leave due to heart----->absolute silence
- Absolute silence: no response = wrong response -----> Shock
- Obeyed up to Very Strong Shock
- Over 60% shocked person at Death level
- Results of Obedience Levels:
- Research Command = 65%
- Fellow Subject Command = 20%
- Victim Command = 0%
- Two Researchers w/ Contrary Commands = 0%
- Message: Authority's Order = Crucial
- Why do we Obey Authority Figures?
- Motivation Choose Correctly
- Authorities = Experts
- Short-cut ---> Choosing Correctly
No comments:
Post a Comment